EW.com Comment Policy We welcome your smart pop culture thoughts—keep ‘em clean and don’t be mean! Please read our Comment Policy before commenting. 57 Comments EW.com Login 1 Recommend Share Sort by Best Join the discussion… LOG IN WITH OR SIGN UP WITH DISQUS Name Guest • 5 years ago So THAT’S why the long face… 34 •Reply•Share › Disney Guest • 5 years ago You guys keep horsing around in here. I can’t believe it! Show some decency. She is so pretty and cute looking. Everyone wants to look as good as her someday. 6 •Reply•Share › − dude Guest • 5 years ago Okay, that one was funny. 6 •Reply•Share › seanpaulmahoney Guest • 5 years ago WIN. 3 •Reply•Share › Troy • 5 years ago I’m no SJP fan, but guys, really? Such mean comments about her looks, which have nothing to do with the article!! 31 •Reply•Share › Jackie Troy • 5 years ago If you notice both comments have the same amount of “likes”. Right now it’s 8. So the same 8 waste-of-human-lifers. They’re probably so big they can’t type with their sausage fingers anymore so they voice text. “SJP .. looks.. like..” Shut up. 3 •Reply•Share › AlanWickman Jackie • 5 years ago My money is on Lucky Lindy in the third. 2 •Reply•Share › Disney Vasquez • 5 years ago That sucks. I love me some SJP! 14 •Reply•Share › Just Sayin’… • 5 years ago I didn’t think SJP was a good Steinem representation, so maybe it’s for the best. I just couldn’t see her as Gloria - it didn’t fit. But it was nice of her to jump in and help, I do remember that…Kudos for doing that! 13 •Reply•Share › This comment was deleted. SS Guest • 5 years ago Idiot. She is beautiful. 20 •Reply•Share › AlanWickman Guest • 5 years ago People getting sick of Sarah Jessica Parker horse jokes? Neigh! NEIGH!!! 11 •Reply•Share › Brody Guest • 5 years ago Wow, haven’t heard that lame, stupid joke a thousand times before. You must really be a hit at parties, dude. 11 •Reply•Share › Fred Phelps Guest • 5 years ago a beautiful horse, i agree. 11 •Reply•Share › AlanWickman Guest • 5 years ago She was great in square pegs from the 80s! 5 •Reply•Share › dude Guest • 5 years ago Snap snap 2 •Reply•Share › Mark Guest • 5 years ago As soon as I saw the picture, I just knew and to be honest was hopng for a comment like this funny - nice work 1 •Reply•Share › FacepalmingGeek Just Sayin’… • 5 years ago AlanWickman: Thank you, I thought I was the only person in the world who remembered that show. So whatever happened to SJP’s costar, Amy Linker? •Reply•Share › PrincessBride FacepalmingGeek • 5 years ago Don’t forget my man Merritt Butrick - aka Johnny Slash, taken from us way too soon! 1 •Reply•Share › Zach • 5 years ago This movie is going to be such a train-wreck anyway, with or without Demi Moore, with or without SJP, and with or without Lohan. I smell Razzies, but hopefully not for the very talented Amanda Seyfried! 9 •Reply•Share › Avery16 Zach • 5 years ago Actually, this wasn’t the movie that Lohan was attached to. That was is called INFERNO. 6 •Reply•Share › FacepalmingGeek Zach • 5 years ago The confusion over the two films is probably going to end up being annoying as hell to Seyfried. “So, Amanada, how does it feel to replace Lindsay Lohan?” “No, no, this isn’t that movie!” “Hey, Amanda, did the crew tell you they dodged a bullet because they didn’t have to work with . . .” “Look, I told you people, this isn’t the same picture. Enough with the Lindsay Lohan stuff.” “So, anyway, did you find any of LiLo’s drug paraphernalia in your . . .” “BLEEP IT, THIS MOVIE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LINDSAY BLEEPING LOHAN, IT NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH LINDSAY BLEEPING LOHAN, AND IT NEVER WILL HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH LINDSAY BLEEPING LOHAN!!! LEAVE ME THE BLEEP ALONE!!!” “Okay, has anyone gotten a quote from Lindsay about this yet?” 5 •Reply•Share › dude Zach • 5 years ago Lindsay Lohan had nothing to do with this. The one you’re thinking of was Inferno which Malin Akerman took over but I’m pretty sure it fell through. 4 •Reply•Share › Avery16 dude • 5 years ago @Heidi this was not the Lohan movie. INFERNO, as keeps being posted is the one she was in. 1 •Reply•Share › Santana dude • 5 years ago Yes, for some reason suddenly everyone wanted to make a Linda Lovelace story so their are actually 2 different movies being made about her, though I’m not sure the one Lindsay was linked too is even still being made. She probably ran their money dry with her shenanigans. •Reply•Share › Heidi dude • 5 years ago Lohan was originally doing this but stuff happened, like it always does with her. •Reply•Share › gustiq • 5 years ago oh thank GOD. SJP looks like a horse with long hair. 8 •Reply•Share › Precious Roy gustiq • 5 years ago No, she looks like a foot. Guess all the potential viewers with that particular fetish have no reason to watch now. 4 •Reply•Share › machomann • 5 years ago She should be edited out of all of her movies. Better yet…DON’T hire her anymore! 6 •Reply•Share › Jamahl • 5 years ago sarah jessica parker is gross. no one wants to see her in a porn. 4 •Reply•Share › alan smithee Jamahl • 5 years ago Did you need read which part SJP was playing? Also, if you think this is a porn movie, you might be disappointed when you see it. 6 •Reply•Share › Allison • 5 years ago I would have cut her just so we didn’t have to look at the crappiest, cheap wig ever,,, 4 •Reply•Share › Dee123 • 5 years ago Oh dear. She fell at the last furlong. 3 •Reply•Share › Robby • 5 years ago When Sarah Jessica told Matthew Broderick the news he asked her “Why such a long face ?” 3 •Reply•Share › AlanWickman Robby • 5 years ago I can’t believe all the horsing around going on in here. 4 •Reply•Share › Unfazed73 • 5 years ago It’s not like her part being cut will change anyones mind about seeing the movie. 3 •Reply•Share › FacepalmingGeek Unfazed73 • 5 years ago Yeah, the movie will probably appeal primarily to those who try to see every “award-bait” film, since it seems to be a grandstanding project specifically calculated to get Amanda an Oscar. (Biopic? Check. Emotionally wrenching subject matter - in this case, spousal abuse? Check. Splashy Sundance debut? Check, check and double check.) •Reply•Share › Torgonomix • 5 years ago Well, at least SJP can still count on being cast as Rarity in the inevitable My Little Pony movie. 2 •Reply•Share › Skull Nemesis • 5 years ago Bring on Hocus Pocus 2! 2 •Reply•Share › meh • 5 years ago I’m sure the real Gloria Steinem is somewhere smiling with relief. 2 •Reply•Share › Disney Vasquez • 5 years ago Zach is an idiot! The film is on everyones must see 2013 list! Learn how movies work dumb#$! 2 •Reply•Share › Al Disney Vasquez • 5 years ago Learn how the reply button works dumb#$! 7 •Reply•Share › Cajunbluesbaby Disney Vasquez • 4 years ago Agree. This might get Seyfried her first Oscar nom & def an Indie Spirit Award nom •Reply•Share › Lulubelle • 5 years ago Judging from that hideous wig on My Little Pony this movie is very low budget and will probably suck. 1 •Reply•Share › Flash-t • 5 years ago “But she was a pro,” A poor choice of words when dealing with porn haha! 1 •Reply•Share › Ajay101 Flash-t • 5 years ago If the comment was about Amanda Seyfried, then your comment would be ….funny •Reply•Share › Mr. Ed • 5 years ago SJP probably doesn’t need this movie anyway after the millions she made from starring in Seabiscuit and War Horse. 1 •Reply•Share › Java’sWar Mr. Ed • 5 years ago Horse Defamation!! •Reply•Share › Lulubelle Mr. Ed • 5 years ago ROTFLMAO •Reply•Share › JT-D • 5 years ago I will be surprised if this film does well. 1 •Reply•Share › Load more comments Powered by Disqus Subscribe Add Disqus to your site Privacy

19 July 2025